Evidence ingestion
Private PDF and spreadsheet evidence is read by the same five-agent pipeline used for live diligence.
Zurvek scans financials, defensibility, market benchmarks and deal risks — then delivers an IC-grade verdict in under 180 seconds.
Mention all. Miss none.
If you've lost capital to any of these, you already know why this matters.
Founder-market misfit, key-person dependency, co-founder conflict, leadership gaps
Key-person dependency is the #1 undetected failure mode in seed-stage deals.
TAM inflation, adoption friction, timing mismatch, competitive saturation
TAM inflation detected in 61% of evaluated decks. Zurvek corrects it.
Technical debt, build-vs-buy fragility, no defensible IP, scalability ceilings
No filed patent + outsourced core logic = zero IP score. Non-negotiable.
Burn rate unsustainability, revenue-expense contradiction, margin erosion
Real revenue vs. reported revenue discrepancy flags a Pf score above 0.6.
Overvaluation vs. sector benchmarks, dilution vulnerability, cap table red flags
At 50x revenue multiples, a 10% fraud probability drops score by 18 points.
Delivery compression, hiring bottlenecks, go-to-market failure patterns
Delivery timelines compress 3x under capital pressure. Zurvek models the gap.
Regulatory exposure, IP ownership gaps, pending litigation signals
Undisclosed IP assignment gaps trigger automatic compliance flags.
No viable acquirer landscape, IPO readiness gaps, liquidity timeline mismatch
Missing acquirer thesis = horizon scored 'indefinite', penalized in final Vₛ.
Confirmation bias in due diligence, halo effect, anchoring on vanity metrics
Anchoring, halo effect, and confirmation bias inflate 73% of failed deals.
Geopolitical sensitivity, supply chain fragility, ESG compliance gaps
Geopolitical sensitivity triggers mandatory ELEVATED status if omitted.
Founder-market misfit, key-person dependency, co-founder conflict, leadership gaps
Key-person dependency is the #1 undetected failure mode in seed-stage deals.
TAM inflation, adoption friction, timing mismatch, competitive saturation
TAM inflation detected in 61% of evaluated decks. Zurvek corrects it.
Technical debt, build-vs-buy fragility, no defensible IP, scalability ceilings
No filed patent + outsourced core logic = zero IP score. Non-negotiable.
Burn rate unsustainability, revenue-expense contradiction, margin erosion
Real revenue vs. reported revenue discrepancy flags a Pf score above 0.6.
Overvaluation vs. sector benchmarks, dilution vulnerability, cap table red flags
At 50x revenue multiples, a 10% fraud probability drops score by 18 points.
Delivery compression, hiring bottlenecks, go-to-market failure patterns
Delivery timelines compress 3x under capital pressure. Zurvek models the gap.
Regulatory exposure, IP ownership gaps, pending litigation signals
Undisclosed IP assignment gaps trigger automatic compliance flags.
No viable acquirer landscape, IPO readiness gaps, liquidity timeline mismatch
Missing acquirer thesis = horizon scored 'indefinite', penalized in final Vₛ.
Confirmation bias in due diligence, halo effect, anchoring on vanity metrics
Anchoring, halo effect, and confirmation bias inflate 73% of failed deals.
Geopolitical sensitivity, supply chain fragility, ESG compliance gaps
Geopolitical sensitivity triggers mandatory ELEVATED status if omitted.
■ Built for every institutional mandate
Seven buyer categories. One intelligence engine. Select your mandate.
Investors ghost decks they can't decode in 2 minutes.
5,000+ decks/year. 2.4 minutes per deck.
Incomplete diligence drives most angel losses.
Portfolio has secrets. NAV doesn't show them.
300+ hours per batch on manual screening.
MSME lending decisions on gut feel.
Regulatory compliance starts at evaluation.
NOT SUMMARIZATION. ADVERSARIAL INTERROGATION
See the five agents contest a real deck
Adversarial review
Five agents interrogate the deck against each other, not a single summariser.
Zero inference
Missing data is reported as missing. Gaps are never filled with assumptions.
Immutable verdict
Every verdict is time-stamped and hashed, so it can be re-read exactly as issued.
T+12 integrity loop
Verdicts are re-checked against real outcomes twelve months later.
1,081+
UNIQUE VISITORS
3,500+
TOTAL PAGEVIEWS
INTELLIGENCE MODULES ACTIVE
■ Zurvek Vault
Vault applies the standard Zurvek evaluation pipeline to private portfolio documents, then preserves the resulting evidence lineage for committee review.
Private PDF and spreadsheet evidence is read by the same five-agent pipeline used for live diligence.
Every completed run keeps its recorded conclusion, evidence fingerprint, and prior-run relationship.
New evidence creates a new evaluation. Earlier records remain intact for committee comparison.
Illustrative evidence brief
One record. Three structural lenses.
Financial integrity
62
Recorded from source evidence
Technical viability
71
Structural signal, not a forecast
Commercial potential
54
Adoption friction remains visible
Live conflict telemetry. Hover a hotspot to trace capital exposure.
Synthesized by Zurvek Engine· Not editorial. Not advisory.
Centra. Institutional Q&A
After every evaluation, Centra interrogates the gaps, what agents couldn't verify, what dark data absences mean, and what changes before you write the check.
Why was the MRR figure flagged as unverifiable?
The deck states Current MRR of ₹8,200. This figure is internally contradicted by a January 2023 date stamp on the same financial page, placing it over three years in the past. No updated revenue statement is provided anywhere in the document.
'Current MRR: ₹8,200', no date anchor on this figure.
'Financials as of January 2023', three year lag confirmed.
'Seed round: April 2025', this is a 2026 raise. The temporal contradiction is critical.
CRITICAL: Traction claim cannot be underwritten from available documents.
No verifiable current revenue exists in this document. Any valuation model built on this MRR figure carries an unquantified staleness risk. This is not a minor gap, it is a due diligence blocker.
Request: Last 6 months GST filings or bank statements before proceeding to term sheet.
"Your deck states MRR of ₹47L. Our unit economics implies a CAC of ₹2.1L at your claimed conversion rate. Walk us through one complete customer acquisition cycle, actuals only."
Centra activates on every completed evaluation · No setup required
SECTION // EVIDENCE OUTPUT
REF: ZURVEK_CORE_V4.021
Sustained across every evaluation conducted on the Zurvek Engine.
HASH-LOCKED VERDICT RECORD
Downloadable on Syndicate tier and above
“You cannot backfill a prediction you didn't make. This moat is absolute.”
Sustained across every evaluation conducted on the Zurvek Engine.
HASH-LOCKED VERDICT RECORD
Downloadable on Syndicate tier and above
“You cannot backfill a prediction you didn't make. This moat is absolute.”
HOW IT WORKS: Every verdict is cryptographically hash-locked and timestamped at issue, so it can be re-verified exactly as issued. Any later edit to the underlying evaluation breaks the hash. A downloadable Verdict Integrity Certificate records that hash, the timestamp and the claims audit for each evaluation.
First contact with adversarial intelligence.
Active deal flow. Individual investor or solo GP.
Deal leads, GPs, small fund committees.
Funds managing >$10M AUM. IC-grade infrastructure.
Custom pricing available for >$50M AUM funds
The same adversarial engine investors use, turned on your own deck before they see it.
Progressively enabled for early access accounts. Not generally available yet.